October 24, 2018

September 30, 2018

Please reload

Recent Posts

We've been on hiatus - but will be back soon!

November 7, 2019

Please reload

Featured Posts

The AAARA Resolution and Incremental Change

March 14, 2018

The adoption reform community was stunned and elated to read the January 13, 2018 resolution from the Academy of Adoption and Assisted Reproduction Attorneys (AAARA), formerly known as the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys (AAAA), endorsing  "an individual’s right to know and access their full personal history, including the identity of their biological parents" and therefore, by extension, direct, unfettered access to:


     1. original birth certificates;

     2. agency records which relate to them and their biological family; and

     3. court records of their adoption.



The Academy has come a long way from its position in 1995, when it endorsed the Uniform Adoption Act (UAA), which was promoted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). The UAA endorsed the release of identifying information between adult parties only by mutual consent, and would have sealed adoption records for 99 years in every state.  I remember going with a nervous, mortified, outraged group of birth/first parents and adoptees who were members of Adoptees in Search in 1995 to testify before a Colorado Task Force Committee against the UAA.  We had no idea what we were doing, but we knew we had to make our voices heard.  Our testimony reportedly made a difference, and Colorado ultimately rejected adoption of the UAA.  


Here is a partial description from a 1995 article by law professor Joan Hollinger(1), who drafted much of the act:  


"The act’s mutual consent registry is a 'user friendly' approach to the contentious issue of whether and when to disclose identifying information to and about the members of an adoptee’s birth and adoptive families. Birthparents and adoptive parents are free to remain anonymous or to maintain contact with each other. Alternatively, birthparents can indicate at any time their willingness to have their identities disclosed to an adopted child when the adoptee is 18 or older. The registry can easily be tailored to accommodate differing state policies, including the confidential intermediary services that many states now have.20


No issue was more bitterly contested by NCCUSL than the question of whether the members of birth and adoptive families should be prohibited from, allowed to, or required to know each other’s identities or maintain contact with each other. This issue polarizes the wide spectrum of views about adoption into two extremes. One extreme is that adoption reinscribes the “natural family” by creating a complete psychosocial as well as legal wall of separation between a child’s birth and adoptive families, which precludes nonconsensual communication between them. The opposing view is that, except in the narrowest of legal terms, adoption is “unnatural” and can never displace a child’s birthfamily. In this view, unless there is clear proof that an adoptee would be significantly harmed by contact with the birthfamily, openness and access to identifying information should be the norm. Because the UAA takes a middle path between these extremes, it potentially displeases those at either extreme."


Prior to her death in 2003, adoptee and adoptive mother Amy Silberberg was a "Quad-A" member, and a fierce advocate within the organization for protection of the interests of birth/first parents during the relinquishment process, as well as adult adoptee access to their heritage via original birth certificates and adoption records.  The seeds that she and others planted in the organization have finally borne fruit. 


The Academy also recognized the following two key societal shifts undergirding the resolution: 


"The benefits of openness in adoption for all members of the adoption triad are recognized by adoption professionals and the adoption community; and


The societal norms which previously supported closed record laws have evolved and are no longer consistent with prioritizing the confidentiality of adoption records over the expressed need or desire of adopted persons to access their adoption records."




Change most often comes in stages, rather than by overnight revolution, according to veteran international political journalist and author